Carrick returned to Bernard\u2019s office before sunset.<\/p>\n
This time he was angry.<\/p>\n
Not defensive.<\/p>\n
Angry.<\/p>\n
Evelyn placed the recovered amendment in front of him.<\/p>\n
\u201cIs that your signature?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
He answered before reading the second page.<\/p>\n
\u201cLook at it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t need to.\u201d<\/p>\n
Naomi Feld touched his arm.<\/p>\n
\u201cLewis.\u201d<\/p>\n
He read it.<\/p>\n
His face hardened.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou\u2019re certain?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCould you have approved the arrangement electronically?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDelegated authority?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot this.\u201d<\/p>\n
He pushed the page away.<\/p>\n
\u201cI told them to stop using Todd.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAfter the hospital incident.\u201d<\/p>\n
The amendment was dated afterward.<\/p>\n
Carrick stared at the typed authorization.<\/p>\n
\u201cSomeone used my name.\u201d<\/p>\n
The symmetry was almost absurd.<\/p>\n
Todd had used Harold\u2019s genuine signature to support a false agreement.<\/p>\n
Now someone had apparently used Carrick\u2019s name to authorize Todd\u2019s bonus.<\/p>\n
Evelyn asked, \u201cWho had authority to approve acquisition incentives?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThree people.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNames.\u201d<\/p>\n
Carrick looked at Naomi.<\/p>\n
She nodded.<\/p>\n
He gave them.<\/p>\n
Lewis Carrick.<\/p>\n
Martin Shaw, Cardinal\u2019s director of land acquisition.<\/p>\n
And Cynthia Rowe, vice president for project development.<\/p>\n
I recognized Rowe\u2019s name from filings.<\/p>\n
Shaw was new.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho worked directly with Redwater?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMartin.\u201d<\/p>\n
Carrick\u2019s answer came quickly.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho hired them?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMartin.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho received Todd\u2019s information?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMostly Martin\u2019s team.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho told the regulatory group the property rights were secured?\u201d<\/p>\n
Carrick became quiet.<\/p>\n
\u201cMartin.\u201d<\/p>\n
The shape of the problem changed.<\/p>\n
Until then, Cardinal had seemed like one large mind.<\/p>\n
It wasn\u2019t.<\/p>\n
Companies were rooms full of people.<\/p>\n
Some knew one fact.<\/p>\n
Some knew another.<\/p>\n
Some wanted schedules met badly enough not to ask questions.<\/p>\n
Harold had understood that too.<\/p>\n
He had left names, not just accusations.<\/p>\n
Evelyn asked Carrick for examples of his real signature.<\/p>\n
Naomi provided several public filings.<\/p>\n
The differences were visible even to me.<\/p>\n
Carrick signed with a large looping L.<\/p>\n
The amendment showed a cramped mark resembling LC.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho could have had this document?\u201d Evelyn asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cRedwater. Martin. Possibly legal.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWould legal approve paying an owner\u2019s son to obtain a sick man\u2019s signature?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
Carrick\u2019s voice was flat.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo competent lawyer would approve language like this.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why put your name on it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTo make Redwater believe executive approval existed.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOr Todd.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Melissa had come with me.<\/p>\n
She sat near the wall, silent.<\/p>\n
Then she asked, \u201cDid Todd know the authorization was fake?\u201d<\/p>\n
Carrick looked at her.<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n
That mattered.<\/p>\n
Todd had done enough without us inventing more.<\/p>\n
Evelyn requested that Carrick preserve his emails and records.<\/p>\n
Naomi said they already had.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
Carrick looked uncomfortable.<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause I expected this.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou expected Cardinal to investigate?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI expected somebody eventually to discover what Martin had done.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he do?\u201d<\/p>\n
Carrick hesitated.<\/p>\n
\u201cI can tell you what I suspected.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTell me.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMartin\u2019s compensation depended heavily on project milestones.\u201d<\/p>\n
There it was.<\/p>\n
Not some grand conspiracy.<\/p>\n
A bonus.<\/p>\n
A schedule.<\/p>\n
A man rewarded for making obstacles disappear.<\/p>\n
Carrick said Shaw had pushed Redwater to secure Harold\u2019s parcel quickly.<\/p>\n
When the forged agreement surfaced, Shaw insisted it was valid.<\/p>\n
When Harold denied it, Shaw characterized him internally as a seller trying to renegotiate.<\/p>\n
When Carrick met Harold and became convinced the signature had been misused, he ordered Shaw to stop dealing through Todd.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cApparently not.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy didn\u2019t you fire him?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI couldn\u2019t prove he knew the agreement was fraudulent.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you try?\u201d<\/p>\n
Carrick looked away.<\/p>\n
\u201cNot hard enough.\u201d<\/p>\n
That answer carried more weight than excuses would have.<\/p>\n
Evelyn asked whether Shaw still worked for Cardinal.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIn what role?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSenior vice president.\u201d<\/p>\n
I laughed once.<\/p>\n
Of course.<\/p>\n
Failure did not always look like failure inside a company.<\/p>\n
Sometimes the project kept moving and the person responsible got promoted.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happens if Cardinal learns you\u2019re talking to us?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThey already know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI informed counsel this morning.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThey advised me not to speculate.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAre you speculating?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSome of this, yes.\u201d<\/p>\n
He pointed to the amendment.<\/p>\n
\u201cBut that is not my signature.\u201d<\/p>\n
Evelyn arranged a forensic examination.<\/p>\n
Priya traced the amendment\u2019s creation history.<\/p>\n
The document originated on a Redwater laptop.<\/p>\n
Metadata listed an author.<\/p>\n
MShaw.<\/p>\n
That alone proved little.<\/p>\n
Initials could mean anything.<\/p>\n
Then Priya recovered embedded revision information.<\/p>\n
One comment had been deleted before the final PDF.<\/p>\n
It read:<\/p>\n
Increase incentive. HV health window narrowing. Need signature before board review.<\/p>\n
Author:<\/p>\n
Martin Shaw.<\/p>\n
Melissa stood and left the room again.<\/p>\n
This time I did not follow immediately.<\/p>\n
I sat staring at the words.<\/p>\n
Health window narrowing.<\/p>\n
Harold\u2019s cancer reduced to a project timeline.<\/p>\n
His nausea.<\/p>\n
His weight loss.<\/p>\n
The mornings when I tied his shoes because bending made him dizzy.<\/p>\n
Somewhere, a man had looked at those facts and seen negotiating leverage.<\/p>\n
I felt anger unlike anything I had felt toward Todd.<\/p>\n
Todd was Harold\u2019s son.<\/p>\n
His betrayal was personal and pathetic and tangled in years of rescue.<\/p>\n
Shaw had no such history.<\/p>\n
To him, Harold had been an obstacle with a narrowing health window.<\/p>\n
Evelyn put her hand over the page.<\/p>\n
\u201cDoreen.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDon\u2019t let this decide the negotiation.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at her.<\/p>\n
\u201cI want to destroy them.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI want their project stopped.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI want every agency to see this.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat may happen.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMay?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYour strongest position comes from being accurate, not furious.\u201d<\/p>\n
Harold would have said the same thing.<\/p>\n
Be mad tonight.<\/p>\n
Be useful tomorrow.<\/p>\n
I hated that both of them were right.<\/p>\n
I went to find Melissa.<\/p>\n
She stood by the stairwell.<\/p>\n
\u201cDad was dying and they were timing him.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTodd helped.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
She looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t know how to be his sister after this.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou don\u2019t have to decide today.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWould you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cForgive him.\u201d<\/p>\n
I thought carefully.<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n
She nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cThank you.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor what?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot pretending.\u201d<\/p>\n
We returned.<\/p>\n
Evelyn had received a call from Cardinal\u2019s general counsel.<\/p>\n
They wanted a meeting.<\/p>\n
Immediately.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy now?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
Carrick gave a grim smile.<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause if Martin\u2019s authorship is authentic, their problem just became internal.\u201d<\/p>\n
Cardinal proposed a standstill.<\/p>\n
They would suspend all attempts to access my parcel for fourteen days.<\/p>\n
We would refrain from contacting regulators during that period.<\/p>\n
Evelyn rejected the second condition.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou don\u2019t get silence as the price of not trespassing.\u201d<\/p>\n
Cardinal revised.<\/p>\n
No silence requirement.<\/p>\n
Meeting the following morning.<\/p>\n
Their headquarters.<\/p>\n
I refused.<\/p>\n
\u201cMy house.\u201d<\/p>\n
Everyone looked at me.<\/p>\n
Evelyn said, \u201cDoreen\u2014\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThey want my property.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThey can come to me.\u201d<\/p>\n
Cardinal agreed.<\/p>\n
At nine the next morning, three black vehicles arrived.<\/p>\n
Melissa watched from the living-room window.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s subtle.\u201d<\/p>\n
I almost smiled.<\/p>\n
Cardinal sent general counsel Rachel Dunn, project president Anthony Pierce, two outside attorneys, and Martin Shaw.<\/p>\n
Shaw was younger than I expected.<\/p>\n
Fifty, perhaps.<\/p>\n
Trim.<\/p>\n
Confident.<\/p>\n
He shook everyone\u2019s hand except Carrick\u2019s.<\/p>\n
Carrick had come at Evelyn\u2019s request.<\/p>\n
The two men looked at each other without greeting.<\/p>\n
We sat at the kitchen table.<\/p>\n
Not enough chairs.<\/p>\n
Shaw ended up in Harold\u2019s old chair.<\/p>\n
I nearly told him to move.<\/p>\n
Then decided Harold would have enjoyed the irony.<\/p>\n
Rachel Dunn began.<\/p>\n
\u201cMrs. Vance, Cardinal takes the concerns raised by your counsel seriously.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you before yesterday?\u201d<\/p>\n
Her expression barely changed.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe are reviewing historical events.\u201d<\/p>\n
Evelyn took over.<\/p>\n
She laid out the disputed agreement.<\/p>\n
Harold\u2019s affidavit.<\/p>\n
Carrick\u2019s May 6 letter.<\/p>\n
The public filings.<\/p>\n
Todd\u2019s payments.<\/p>\n
The recovered incentive amendment.<\/p>\n
Then the metadata comment.<\/p>\n
Health window narrowing.<\/p>\n
Shaw did not react.<\/p>\n
Rachel did.<\/p>\n
Only slightly.<\/p>\n
\u201cMartin?\u201d<\/p>\n
He looked at the page.<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t remember writing that.\u201d<\/p>\n
Carrick laughed.<\/p>\n
Shaw turned toward him.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou have something to say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSave it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
The room tightened.<\/p>\n
Rachel intervened.<\/p>\n
\u201cLewis.\u201d<\/p>\n
Carrick ignored her.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou were told to stop using Todd.\u201d<\/p>\n
Shaw leaned back.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou were trying to kill a billion-dollar project over a family property dispute.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt wasn\u2019t a family dispute.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAt the time, that wasn\u2019t clear.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHarold told us the signature was stolen.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHarold wanted more money.\u201d<\/p>\n
I spoke.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe wanted the record corrected.\u201d<\/p>\n
Shaw looked at me for the first time.<\/p>\n
\u201cWith respect, Mrs. Vance, your husband was a sophisticated negotiator.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe understood pressure.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo do I.\u201d<\/p>\n
That silenced him.<\/p>\n
Evelyn asked Shaw directly whether he authorized Todd\u2019s success incentive.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you authorize Redwater to continue communicating with Todd after Carrick instructed otherwise?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t recall.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you write \u2018HV health window narrowing\u2019?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t recall.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you know Harold was undergoing cancer treatment?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEventually.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you tell Redwater that his illness increased urgency?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t recall.\u201d<\/p>\n
The phrase became almost comical.<\/p>\n
Until Evelyn produced an email Priya had recovered from Todd\u2019s deleted files.<\/p>\n
From Martin Shaw to Grant Heller.<\/p>\n
Subject: VANCE.<\/p>\n
Need family channel maintained. Owner unlikely to hold position indefinitely given circumstances.<\/p>\n
Shaw stared at it.<\/p>\n
Rachel Dunn stopped taking notes.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhere did you obtain that?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom evidence lawfully provided by Harold\u2019s family.\u201d<\/p>\n
Shaw\u2019s jaw tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat email is being mischaracterized.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI was discussing negotiation timing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBased on Harold\u2019s illness?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBased on multiple factors.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat other factors?\u201d<\/p>\n
He did not answer.<\/p>\n
I watched him sitting in Harold\u2019s chair.<\/p>\n
Then I understood something.<\/p>\n
This man expected anger.<\/p>\n
Threats.<\/p>\n
A demand for a gigantic check.<\/p>\n
Those things would let him reduce me to what he had reduced Harold to.<\/p>\n
A seller.<\/p>\n
So I asked the question Harold had wanted Cardinal to answer from the beginning.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat rights do you need?\u201d<\/p>\n
Shaw blinked.<\/p>\n
Rachel answered.<\/p>\n
\u201cMrs. Vance\u2014\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo. Every right. Separately.\u201d<\/p>\n
Evelyn said nothing.<\/p>\n
I continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cSurface corridor.\u201d<\/p>\n
Rachel nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cPermanent easement.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTemporary construction access.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCreek crossing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCompression tie-in.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cUnderground storage.\u201d<\/p>\n
A pause.<\/p>\n
Then Rachel said, \u201cPotential future storage rights.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPore space?\u201d<\/p>\n
Another pause.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOld mine voids?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cExpansion rights?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cExclusivity?\u201d<\/p>\n
Rachel looked at one of the outside lawyers.<\/p>\n
\u201cCertain restrictions on competing infrastructure would be required.\u201d<\/p>\n
I leaned back.<\/p>\n
For the first time, Cardinal had said it aloud.<\/p>\n
Not one piece of land.<\/p>\n
A bundle of rights.<\/p>\n
Harold\u2019s bundle.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow much are you offering?\u201d<\/p>\n
Rachel placed a folder on the table.<\/p>\n
\u201cCardinal is prepared to resolve all property matters for thirty-five million dollars.\u201d<\/p>\n
Nobody moved.<\/p>\n
Thirty-five million.<\/p>\n
Melissa inhaled sharply.<\/p>\n
Shaw watched me.<\/p>\n
He expected the number to do what Harold\u2019s illness had not.<\/p>\n
Make me hurry.<\/p>\n
I did not touch the folder.<\/p>\n
\u201cDoes that include correcting your filings?\u201d<\/p>\n
Rachel paused.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe settlement includes appropriate regulatory disclosures.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does appropriate mean?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe would work with relevant agencies.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWill Cardinal state that the Redwater agreement was disputed before your representations were made?\u201d<\/p>\n
Another pause.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat language would require review.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen you\u2019re still buying silence.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt sounds expensive for something that isn\u2019t silence.\u201d<\/p>\n
Shaw leaned forward.<\/p>\n
\u201cThirty-five million dollars is an extraordinary offer for ten acres.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at him.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou\u2019re not buying ten acres.\u201d<\/p>\n
He stopped.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou just spent fifteen minutes telling me everything else you need.\u201d<\/p>\n
Carrick looked down, hiding a smile.<\/p>\n
I pushed the folder back.<\/p>\n
\u201cVerify the rights. Correct the record. Then we talk about money.\u201d<\/p>\n
Shaw stared at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cMrs. Vance, you may not see another offer like this.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stood.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s what Todd said about twenty thousand.\u201d<\/p>\n
The meeting ended.<\/p>\n
After Cardinal left, Melissa sat in stunned silence.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou turned down thirty-five million dollars.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you understand how much money that is?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you?\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at Harold\u2019s chair.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Evelyn gathered the papers.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou did the right thing not signing today.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat sounded almost like approval.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt was procedural approval. Don\u2019t get excited.\u201d<\/p>\n
I smiled.<\/p>\n
Then Priya called.<\/p>\n
Her voice was urgent.<\/p>\n
She had recovered one more deleted email chain from Todd\u2019s flash drive.<\/p>\n
It involved Shaw.<\/p>\n
Heller.<\/p>\n
Todd.<\/p>\n
And a subject line we had not seen.<\/p>\n
BACKUP PLAN.<\/p>\n
The emails discussed what would happen if Harold died before signing.<\/p>\n
Todd wrote that inheritance could complicate control.<\/p>\n
Shaw responded:<\/p>\n
Depends who receives parcel.<\/p>\n
Heller:<\/p>\n
Son expects share.<\/p>\n
Then Todd:<\/p>\n
If Dad follows old will, yes.<\/p>\n
Shaw\u2019s reply was brief.<\/p>\n
Keep us informed if estate plan changes.<\/p>\n
I stared at the date.<\/p>\n
Three weeks before Harold changed his will.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does that mean?\u201d Melissa asked.<\/p>\n
Evelyn\u2019s expression had become hard.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt means Todd was reporting on Harold\u2019s estate planning to the people trying to acquire his land.\u201d<\/p>\n
But there was one final email.<\/p>\n
Sent two days after Harold changed the will.<\/p>\n
Todd to Heller:<\/p>\n
He changed it. I\u2019m out.<\/p>\n
Heller:<\/p>\n
Who gets parcel?<\/p>\n
Todd:<\/p>\n
Doreen.<\/p>\n
Shaw replied four minutes later.<\/p>\n
Then she becomes the path.<\/p>\n
Carrick returned to Bernard\u2019s office before sunset. This time he was angry. Not defensive. Angry. Evelyn placed the recovered amendment in front of him. \u201cIs that your signature?\u201d \u201cNo.\u201d He … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3262,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3273","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-chapter-story"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3273","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3273"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3273\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3289,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3273\/revisions\/3289"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/3262"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3273"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3273"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3273"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}