Nathan did not deny it.<\/p>\n
That surprised me.<\/p>\n
When Cho confronted him at St. Matthew, he closed his eyes and said, \u201cYes. I went with her.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stood at the foot of his bed.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou helped her impersonate me.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo not insult me with technical distinctions.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI didn\u2019t know she had forged authorization.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou watched her collect my husband\u2019s archive.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause she told me Frank had evidence against Reyes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe was right.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd instead of going through lawful channels, you helped her take it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI thought the records might disappear if Reyes learned the firm had them.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat explanation would sound better if you had told police six months ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you open the drive?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou couldn\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you know there was a second key?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cKelsey thought there was.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo she came searching for it.\u201d<\/p>\n
Nathan looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMultiple times.\u201d<\/p>\n
The townhouse deposit.<\/p>\n
The scans.<\/p>\n
The attic.<\/p>\n
The visits disguised as helping.<\/p>\n
Every act of intimacy now cast a second shadow.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid she search my house?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe said she looked through your study once.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOnce?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s what she told me.\u201d<\/p>\n
I laughed softly.<\/p>\n
\u201cAn unreliable woman gave you an exact number and you kept it.\u201d<\/p>\n
Nathan did not answer.<\/p>\n
Cho asked, \u201cDid Daniel know about the drive?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEventually.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cReyes?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t think so.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPatricia?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cArthur?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI didn\u2019t know Arthur existed.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Kelsey tell you who Frank was?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow much?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat he had discovered the old equipment fraud.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd Karen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat Reyes had maintained a profile.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid you know Daniel planned to use it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot then.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen did you know?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAbout seven months ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
Again.<\/p>\n
The same point where everyone\u2019s stories became uglier.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened seven months ago?\u201d Cho asked.<\/p>\n
Nathan stared at the ceiling.<\/p>\n
\u201cKelsey opened one of the archive copies.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWith what key?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe found a partial password in Frank\u2019s documents.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot enough for the digital drive.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo. Enough for several encrypted PDFs.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat was inside?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNames. Old payment chains. Reyes\u2019s vendor relationships.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cArthur Bell.\u201d<\/p>\n
Arthur\u2019s betrayal.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid that shock her?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause she trusted him.\u201d<\/p>\n
So had Frank.<\/p>\n
So had we.<\/p>\n
\u201cShe started asking whether everyone who claimed to help had been compromised.\u201d<\/p>\n
A reasonable question, if one ignored her own conduct.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did she do next?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe confronted Arthur.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was new.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSix months ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI wasn\u2019t there.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid she tell you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe said Arthur admitted helping Reyes but claimed Frank forgave him.\u201d<\/p>\n
Arthur\u2019s story matched.<\/p>\n
\u201cThen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe became obsessed with opening the drive.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe thought Frank had identified who had been running the modern version of the operation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cReyes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe didn\u2019t know that then.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid she suspect him?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why work with Daniel?\u201d<\/p>\n
Nathan\u2019s jaw tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause Daniel promised access to Reyes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Cho said, \u201cExplain.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel told her the only way to prove Reyes was still operating was to enter the network from inside.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stared.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo Kelsey joined the fraud as an informant?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
Nathan\u2019s answer came quickly.<\/p>\n
\u201cAt least not after the first month.\u201d<\/p>\n
There was the line.<\/p>\n
The one separating intention from choice.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMoney.\u201d<\/p>\n
Simple.<\/p>\n
Ugly.<\/p>\n
Human.<\/p>\n
\u201cShe was already in debt. Daniel started paying her.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd she kept going.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid she tell herself she was still collecting evidence?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWas she?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSometimes.\u201d<\/p>\n
I almost admired the accuracy of that answer.<\/p>\n
People rarely become one thing cleanly.<\/p>\n
Kelsey could be guilty and frightened.<\/p>\n
Exploitative and remorseful.<\/p>\n
Searching for evidence while stealing money.<\/p>\n
Contradictions do not cancel each other.<\/p>\n
They accumulate.<\/p>\n
Cho asked, \u201cHow did Karen\u2019s identity enter?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel wanted strong credit profiles.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cKelsey suggested Karen?\u201d<\/p>\n
Nathan hesitated.<\/p>\n
I felt the answer before he gave it.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Grady, standing behind me, shut his eyes.<\/p>\n
That detail had not changed.<\/p>\n
Reyes may have insisted later.<\/p>\n
Daniel may have had old motives.<\/p>\n
But Kelsey had opened the door.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
Nathan looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cShe said your profile was already in Reyes\u2019s archived records.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is not why.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe said you had enough money and enough organizational skill to recover if the accounts were discovered.\u201d<\/p>\n
My throat tightened.<\/p>\n
Recover.<\/p>\n
As if resilience were permission to injure someone.<\/p>\n
\u201cShe chose me because I could survive it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was perhaps the most revealing thing anyone had said about her.<\/p>\n
I had been useful because I was strong.<\/p>\n
People do that.<\/p>\n
They give the hardest burdens to whoever appears least likely to collapse.<\/p>\n
Then congratulate themselves because the person remained standing.<\/p>\n
Cho said, \u201cDid Reyes order it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAfter Daniel mentioned the profile, yes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo Kelsey suggested, Daniel considered, Reyes approved.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd you?\u201d<\/p>\n
Nathan looked away.<\/p>\n
\u201cI knew later.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou did nothing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI tried to stop her.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAfter money moved?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAfter loans opened?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAfter Karen\u2019s information had been used?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen you were too late by choice.\u201d<\/p>\n
Nathan accepted that in silence.<\/p>\n
We left the hospital with the same feeling I had carried out of too many rooms lately.<\/p>\n
More truth.<\/p>\n
Less certainty about what any person deserved from me.<\/p>\n
At my house, Cho brought a forensic specialist to decrypt Frank\u2019s digital drive using the code hidden behind our wedding photograph.<\/p>\n
The process took nearly an hour.<\/p>\n
Grady sat on the sofa.<\/p>\n
Arthur waited at the station.<\/p>\n
Kelsey remained at her sister\u2019s under instructions not to contact anyone involved.<\/p>\n
I stood in the kitchen washing the same mug twice.<\/p>\n
Finally the specialist called us.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re in.\u201d<\/p>\n
Frank had organized the drive with irritating perfection.<\/p>\n
Folders by year.<\/p>\n
Subfolders by entity.<\/p>\n
Scans.<\/p>\n
Notes.<\/p>\n
Audio.<\/p>\n
Photographs.<\/p>\n
One folder was titled:<\/p>\n
IF REYES RETURNS.<\/p>\n
Another:<\/p>\n
ARTHUR.<\/p>\n
Another:<\/p>\n
KELSEY LANE.<\/p>\n
My chest tightened.<\/p>\n
Frank had indeed known her.<\/p>\n
Inside her folder were scans of the records she brought him eight years earlier.<\/p>\n
Procurement logs.<\/p>\n
Internal emails.<\/p>\n
A handwritten statement.<\/p>\n
Kelsey had signed it.<\/p>\n
I, Kelsey Lane, believe Malcolm Reyes is directing staff to retrieve and alter old procurement records related to Westridge Clinical Recovery.<\/p>\n
I have seen him request deletion of archive references without normal approval.<\/p>\n
I am afraid my credentials may have been used.<\/p>\n
The statement continued.<\/p>\n
Frank had documented helping her leave the contract and advised her to contact an attorney.<\/p>\n
She never did.<\/p>\n
Then came a note from Frank.<\/p>\n
Kelsey frightened but not dishonest as far as I can tell.<\/p>\n
Young. In debt. Worried about career.<\/p>\n
Reminds me of Karen when she thinks fear is something to be embarrassed by.<\/p>\n
I stared at that sentence.<\/p>\n
Frank\u2019s generosity toward people could be maddening.<\/p>\n
He saw what someone might become rather than only what they were.<\/p>\n
Sometimes that was wisdom.<\/p>\n
Sometimes it was how he got hurt.<\/p>\n
Grady read over my shoulder.<\/p>\n
\u201cDad liked her.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe would hate what she did.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Both could be true.<\/p>\n
Cho opened IF REYES RETURNS.<\/p>\n
The first document was a summary Frank had written shortly before his health worsened.<\/p>\n
If Reyes rebuilds this network, he will likely need three things:<\/p>\n
1. Internal hospital access.
\n2. An outside procurement channel.
\n3. Clean identities for financing.<\/p>\n
I looked at Cho.<\/p>\n
He had predicted the structure almost exactly.<\/p>\n
Below that:<\/p>\n
Likely weakness: people.<\/p>\n
Reyes believes everyone can be bought, frightened, or discredited.<\/p>\n
His mistake is assuming people stay compromised forever.<\/p>\n
I thought of Patricia.<\/p>\n
Arthur.<\/p>\n
Nathan.<\/p>\n
Kelsey.<\/p>\n
Every one of them compromised.<\/p>\n
Every one eventually broke from Reyes in some way.<\/p>\n
Frank had understood the ending before the rest of us understood the beginning.<\/p>\n
A second document contained names.<\/p>\n
Patricia Voss.<\/p>\n
Arthur Bell.<\/p>\n
Elliot Crane, then a junior buyer.<\/p>\n
Malcolm Reyes.<\/p>\n
Robert Ellis.<\/p>\n
And one unfamiliar name.<\/p>\n
Seth Calder.<\/p>\n
Cho frowned.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho is that?\u201d<\/p>\n
I did not know.<\/p>\n
The forensic specialist searched the drive.<\/p>\n
Calder appeared repeatedly in payment records.<\/p>\n
A consultant.<\/p>\n
Later an attorney.<\/p>\n
Then a corporate registration agent for shell companies tied to medical vendors.<\/p>\n
Cho immediately called her office.<\/p>\n
\u201cFind him.\u201d<\/p>\n
Ten minutes later, she had an answer.<\/p>\n
Seth Calder was alive.<\/p>\n
Seventy-two.<\/p>\n
Still practicing law.<\/p>\n
And currently representing Malcolm Reyes.<\/p>\n
I stared at her.<\/p>\n
\u201cHis lawyer is part of the old scheme.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAccording to Frank\u2019s records, he handled corporate filings.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDoes that prove criminal involvement?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBut Reyes chose him now.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
That could not be coincidence.<\/p>\n
Frank\u2019s next note was dated eleven years earlier.<\/p>\n
S.C. knows every entity.<\/p>\n
If M.R. ever needs to rebuild, S.C. can recreate companies under new names.<\/p>\n
That was not merely old knowledge.<\/p>\n
It was a blueprint.<\/p>\n
Cho\u2019s expression hardened.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf Calder has been advising Reyes during the current investigation, he may know where assets and data are hidden.\u201d<\/p>\n
Grady asked, \u201cCan attorney-client privilege protect that?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot criminal participation.\u201d<\/p>\n
Her phone was already in her hand.<\/p>\n
Before she could call, the forensic specialist opened another file.<\/p>\n
Recent access log.<\/p>\n
The drive had been connected six months earlier.<\/p>\n
Kelsey.<\/p>\n
A second access two weeks later.<\/p>\n
Unknown device.<\/p>\n
A third three months ago.<\/p>\n
Unknown device.<\/p>\n
A fourth only twelve days earlier.<\/p>\n
Unknown device.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow?\u201d I asked. \u201cIf she couldn\u2019t decrypt it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe could still copy the encrypted drive.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid she?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLikely.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho got the copies?\u201d<\/p>\n
We did not know.<\/p>\n
Then the specialist found a hidden sync record.<\/p>\n
One device identifier.<\/p>\n
Registered manufacturer.<\/p>\n
Serial prefix.<\/p>\n
Hospital-issued laptop.<\/p>\n
St. Matthew.<\/p>\n
Cho began cross-referencing.<\/p>\n
The device had been assigned to Malcolm Reyes.<\/p>\n
So Reyes had obtained a copy of Frank\u2019s archive months ago.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe already knew everything Frank had,\u201d Grady said.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why demand the box?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause physical originals can corroborate digital copies.\u201d<\/p>\n
Cho shook her head.<\/p>\n
\u201cOr because he didn\u2019t know whether Frank had added something else.\u201d<\/p>\n
The specialist opened one final folder.<\/p>\n
It had no title.<\/p>\n
Only a date.<\/p>\n
Three weeks before Frank\u2019s last hospitalization.<\/p>\n
Inside was an audio file.<\/p>\n
Frank\u2019s voice.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf this is being heard because Westridge came back, then I was right about one thing and wrong about another.\u201d<\/p>\n
I sat down.<\/p>\n
Frank continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cI was right that Reyes would rebuild if he found enough people willing to look away.\u201d<\/p>\n
A pause.<\/p>\n
\u201cI was wrong about why.\u201d<\/p>\n
Paper rustled in the recording.<\/p>\n
\u201cI thought money was the center.\u201d<\/p>\n
Another pause.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt isn\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe center is leverage.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cReyes does not need honest partners. He needs people who have done one thing they are ashamed to admit.\u201d<\/p>\n
Arthur.<\/p>\n
Patricia.<\/p>\n
Nathan.<\/p>\n
Kelsey.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe gives them a small compromise, then builds a cage from it.\u201d<\/p>\n
Grady looked at me.<\/p>\n
Frank\u2019s voice softened.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf Grady ever hears this, tell him something I should have told him while I had the chance.\u201d<\/p>\n
My son froze.<\/p>\n
\u201cBeing ashamed of one bad choice does not mean you owe anyone the next one.\u201d<\/p>\n
Grady covered his mouth.<\/p>\n
I closed my eyes.<\/p>\n
Frank continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd Karen, if you\u2019re angry I kept this from you, good. Stay angry long enough to finish what I didn\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n
I laughed softly through tears.<\/p>\n
Then came the final sentence.<\/p>\n
\u201cOne more thing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIf Reyes starts again, do not focus only on him.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe person who matters is whoever gives him clean identities.\u201d<\/p>\n
Silence.<\/p>\n
Then:<\/p>\n
\u201cThat person is the real engine.\u201d<\/p>\n
The recording ended.<\/p>\n
No name.<\/p>\n
No final accusation.<\/p>\n
Only the role.<\/p>\n
Clean identities.<\/p>\n
I thought of Kelsey.<\/p>\n
Then stopped.<\/p>\n
Too easy.<\/p>\n
She had supplied mine.<\/p>\n
But fourteen files existed before her involvement deepened.<\/p>\n
Patient profiles had been created through hospital records.<\/p>\n
Someone had been harvesting identities systematically.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho built the profiles?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
Cho looked at the recovered evidence list.<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel had some.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cReyes ordered some.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHospital systems supplied data.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho assembled them?\u201d<\/p>\n
No one answered.<\/p>\n
The specialist searched metadata from Frank\u2019s archive.<\/p>\n
Old identity spreadsheets.<\/p>\n
Document creator fields.<\/p>\n
Initials appeared repeatedly.<\/p>\n
S.C.<\/p>\n
Seth Calder.<\/p>\n
Cho\u2019s face changed.<\/p>\n
The lawyer.<\/p>\n
Not merely filing shell companies.<\/p>\n
Building profiles.<\/p>\n
Maintaining legal identities.<\/p>\n
Creating corporations.<\/p>\n
Preparing authorizations.<\/p>\n
Making fraud look documented.<\/p>\n
The real engine.<\/p>\n
Her phone rang before she could speak.<\/p>\n
She answered.<\/p>\n
Listened.<\/p>\n
Then looked at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cSeth Calder is not at his office.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhere?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cUnknown.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cReyes?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIn custody.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIn custody.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPatricia?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCooperating.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cElliot?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDetained.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cKelsey?\u201d<\/p>\n
Cho\u2019s face tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe\u2019s not at her sister\u2019s.\u201d<\/p>\n
Grady stood.<\/p>\n
\u201cAgain?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHer sister says someone arrived twenty minutes ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOlder man. Gray sedan.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach dropped.<\/p>\n
\u201cSeth Calder.\u201d<\/p>\n
Cho was already calling units.<\/p>\n
Grady\u2019s phone buzzed.<\/p>\n
A message from Kelsey.<\/p>\n
One sentence.<\/p>\n
I know who created your mother\u2019s signatures.<\/p>\n
Then another.<\/p>\n
He says he can prove Frank was involved.<\/p>\n
Grady typed immediately.<\/p>\n
Where are you?<\/p>\n
The reply came.<\/p>\n
No address.<\/p>\n
Only a photograph.<\/p>\n
Kelsey sitting inside a car.<\/p>\n
Beside her, partially visible, was an older man in a dark suit.<\/p>\n
On his lap rested a folder.<\/p>\n
Across the tab, in block letters, were the words:<\/p>\n
FRANK WHITLOW \u2014 ORIGINALS<\/p>\n
Then a final message arrived.<\/p>\n
If Karen wants the truth about her husband, she comes without police.<\/p>\n
Nathan did not deny it. That surprised me. When Cho confronted him at St. Matthew, he closed his eyes and said, \u201cYes. I went with her.\u201d I stood at the … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4236,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4252","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-chapter-story"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4252","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4252"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4252\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4270,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4252\/revisions\/4270"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/4236"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4252"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4252"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4252"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}