Derek requested another interview the following morning.<\/p>\n
This time, he brought an attorney.<\/p>\n
Naomi told me about it afterward, not because I had any right to hear every detail, but because Derek had specifically authorized disclosure of several statements involving me.<\/p>\n
His strategy had changed.<\/p>\n
He was cooperating.<\/p>\n
Not out of courage.<\/p>\n
Not out of sudden loyalty to the technicians whose paychecks he had reduced.<\/p>\n
He wanted to protect himself.<\/p>\n
I respected the clarity of that more than I expected.<\/p>\n
Derek admitted he had knowingly approved deductions without sufficient evidence.<\/p>\n
He admitted he had used shared accountability to meet monthly recovery targets.<\/p>\n
He admitted he had split larger adjustments into smaller categories because employees were less likely to escalate them.<\/p>\n
He admitted that employees who repeatedly challenged deductions were sometimes described as alignment problems.<\/p>\n
He also admitted he had participated in limiting overtime and preferred assignments for several of those employees.<\/p>\n
Frank was one.<\/p>\n
Marcus was another.<\/p>\n
I was a third.<\/p>\n
Derek denied inventing every underlying issue.<\/p>\n
Some deductions, he insisted, involved genuine employee negligence.<\/p>\n
Some equipment had really been lost.<\/p>\n
Some service failures had genuinely cost Hartwell money.<\/p>\n
Some employees had acknowledged responsibility.<\/p>\n
Naomi considered that important.<\/p>\n
The investigation was not going to pretend every deduction was false merely because the system had been abused.<\/p>\n
That distinction would later matter to hundreds of people.<\/p>\n
Derek\u2019s most consequential disclosure concerned my final paycheck.<\/p>\n
After I submitted my resignation, he reviewed my outstanding adjustments.<\/p>\n
Several were weak.<\/p>\n
One lacked supporting documentation entirely.<\/p>\n
He asked Grant whether they should be removed.<\/p>\n
Grant told him no.<\/p>\n
Derek asked why it mattered if I was leaving anyway.<\/p>\n
According to Derek, Grant said former employees were easier than current employees.<\/p>\n
They stopped asking questions.<\/p>\n
I sat at our kitchen table while Naomi told me this over the phone.<\/p>\n
Laura was across from me.<\/p>\n
She could hear only my side.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does that mean?\u201d I asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cDerek understood it to mean that once you left, the deductions were unlikely to be challenged internally.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cConvenient.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCan he prove Grant said it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot that exact statement.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo it\u2019s Derek\u2019s word against Grant\u2019s.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor that conversation, yes.\u201d<\/p>\n
There were supporting circumstances.<\/p>\n
The email about not reversing my deductions.<\/p>\n
The established target system.<\/p>\n
The split line items.<\/p>\n
But the spoken remark itself remained an allegation.<\/p>\n
I appreciated Naomi saying so.<\/p>\n
Too much had happened because Hartwell managers treated assumptions as facts.<\/p>\n
The investigation could not repair that by doing the same thing in the opposite direction.<\/p>\n
Derek also described the morning Evelyn summoned me upstairs.<\/p>\n
He had not expected her to review my pay statement.<\/p>\n
Neither had Grant.<\/p>\n
My resignation had reached Evelyn because her assistant prepared a weekly executive personnel summary highlighting departures of long-tenured employees.<\/p>\n
Evelyn noticed my name.<\/p>\n
Six years.<\/p>\n
Senior field engineer.<\/p>\n
No counteroffer requested.<\/p>\n
She asked to see me.<\/p>\n
That was all.<\/p>\n
No whistleblower plan.<\/p>\n
No secret investigation.<\/p>\n
No carefully timed confrontation.<\/p>\n
A routine personnel summary had placed my resignation in front of the one person Grant apparently had not expected to examine it closely.<\/p>\n
When Derek learned I was upstairs, he contacted Grant.<\/p>\n
That explained why Grant arrived so quickly.<\/p>\n
Derek told him Evelyn was asking about deductions.<\/p>\n
Grant\u2019s response, according to the phone record, was brief.<\/p>\n
I\u2019ll handle it.<\/p>\n
He had entered the office expecting a manageable explanation.<\/p>\n
Instead, Caleb appeared.<\/p>\n
Then Frank.<\/p>\n
Ethan.<\/p>\n
Marcus.<\/p>\n
Angela\u2019s records.<\/p>\n
The old server.<\/p>\n
The board reports.<\/p>\n
One question had opened a door that years of formal complaints had failed to move.<\/p>\n
Laura waited until I ended the call.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did Derek say?\u201d<\/p>\n
I told her.<\/p>\n
She sat quietly.<\/p>\n
Then she asked, \u201cDo you hate him?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDerek?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
I considered it.<\/p>\n
\u201cI did.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd now?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t know.\u201d<\/p>\n
That surprised her.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe knew what he was doing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe took money from us.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe punished you for complaining.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen what is there not to know?\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked toward the window.<\/p>\n
\u201cHating him doesn\u2019t tell me anything useful.\u201d<\/p>\n
Laura studied me.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou\u2019ve changed jobs for three weeks and already sound philosophical.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m getting old.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou were old before.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThank you.\u201d<\/p>\n
She smiled despite herself.<\/p>\n
Then the smile faded.<\/p>\n
\u201cI hate him.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s allowed.\u201d<\/p>\n
Two days later, Evelyn asked to meet me alone.<\/p>\n
Not at Hartwell.<\/p>\n
Not at Naomi\u2019s office.<\/p>\n
We met at a coffee shop near Northline after work.<\/p>\n
She arrived before me and was sitting in a corner booth without an assistant.<\/p>\n
For the first time, she looked less like Hartwell\u2019s CEO than a tired woman who had not slept enough in several weeks.<\/p>\n
I sat across from her.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou know Naomi will probably be annoyed that you\u2019re talking to me without counsel.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI told her.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe was annoyed.\u201d<\/p>\n
I smiled.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did you want?\u201d<\/p>\n
Evelyn wrapped both hands around her coffee.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe board asked me whether I should remain CEO.\u201d<\/p>\n
I had no idea what to say.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo I\u2019m asking you something.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat sounds dangerous.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cProbably.\u201d<\/p>\n
She looked directly at me.<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you think I failed you?\u201d<\/p>\n
I leaned back.<\/p>\n
That was not a question I wanted.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou\u2019re asking an employee you barely knew existed three weeks ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI knew you existed.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou knew my name.\u201d<\/p>\n
She accepted that.<\/p>\n
\u201cFair.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at her.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy ask me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause everyone around me has an interest.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYour board?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGovernance.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLawyers?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLiability.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cExecutives?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTheir jobs.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd you think I don\u2019t?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou already left.\u201d<\/p>\n
I almost laughed.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat doesn\u2019t make me objective.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
She looked down.<\/p>\n
\u201cBut you\u2019ve been more careful about what you claim than some people inside the company.\u201d<\/p>\n
That surprised me.<\/p>\n
I thought before answering.<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you want me to tell you whether you should resign?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGood, because I won\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n
She nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cI want to know what I missed.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s different.\u201d<\/p>\n
I took a drink.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou missed what everyone above us missed.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe amounts were small enough individually.\u201d<\/p>\n
Her eyes stayed on me.<\/p>\n
\u201cTwo hundred here. Four hundred there. A technician complains, somebody explains it away, and everybody goes back to work.\u201d<\/p>\n
I thought about the executive floor.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou saw department numbers.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe saw grocery money.\u201d<\/p>\n
She looked down.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s the part I can\u2019t stop thinking about.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen don\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n
Her eyes lifted.<\/p>\n
\u201cUse it.\u201d<\/p>\n
She was silent.<\/p>\n
I continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cYour board saw distributed cost ownership. Grant saw performance metrics. Derek saw monthly targets. Payroll saw adjustment codes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd you?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLaura saw a declined card.\u201d<\/p>\n
That ended the conversation for several seconds.<\/p>\n
Evelyn finally said, \u201cI approved Grant\u2019s promotion.\u201d<\/p>\n
I did not answer.<\/p>\n
\u201cI put him over operations.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe\u2019s your brother.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat made me trust him more.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cProbably.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI defended him when managers said he was too aggressive.\u201d<\/p>\n
I waited.<\/p>\n
\u201cI thought aggressive meant demanding.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSometimes it does.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd sometimes?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSometimes it means the people underneath you are afraid to say no.\u201d<\/p>\n
She nodded slowly.<\/p>\n
The conversation could easily have become an apology designed to make her feel better.<\/p>\n
I did not let it.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat are you doing about the people who complained before me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re reviewing every case.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s a process.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat are you doing?\u201d<\/p>\n
She understood the distinction.<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m meeting with the board twice a week. I authorized outside investigators to report directly to the independent directors, not through me.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGood.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019ve waived executive confidentiality over relevant compensation records.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGood.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI asked them to review my decisions too.\u201d<\/p>\n
That mattered.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf they find you knew?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen they should say so.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd if they find you should have known?\u201d<\/p>\n
Her expression tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cThen they should say that too.\u201d<\/p>\n
I nodded.<\/p>\n
That was as much as I could ask from her.<\/p>\n
Before we left, she told me the preliminary reimbursement calculations were nearly finished.<\/p>\n
My case had been reviewed line by line.<\/p>\n
Some adjustments were legitimate.<\/p>\n
That surprised me less than she expected.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow many?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThree.\u201d<\/p>\n
One involved a personal equipment purchase I had agreed to repay.<\/p>\n
Another involved a benefit correction.<\/p>\n
The third was an advance reconciliation.<\/p>\n
I remembered all of them.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about the rest?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMost appear unsupported, improperly applied, duplicated, or inconsistent with the compensation terms in effect.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow much?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t have the final figure.\u201d<\/p>\n
I smiled.<\/p>\n
\u201cNo promises before the numbers.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cExactly.\u201d<\/p>\n
She almost smiled too.<\/p>\n
Then she became serious.<\/p>\n
\u201cDaniel, there is something else.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBlue River expanded.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow many sites?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEngineering found the alternate sensor configuration at nineteen.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNineteen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFailures?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIntermittent faults at six. No safety incidents identified.\u201d<\/p>\n
That was a relief.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat are you doing?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cContacting every affected customer.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEven the ones without failures?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
That answer came immediately.<\/p>\n
\u201cReplacing equipment?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhere required. Correcting installation documentation everywhere.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho pays?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHartwell.\u201d<\/p>\n
Not technicians.<\/p>\n
Not customers.<\/p>\n
Hartwell.<\/p>\n
I nodded.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat sounds like accountability.\u201d<\/p>\n
She gave a tired laugh.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Then she told me something I did not expect.<\/p>\n
Blue River had responded to Hartwell\u2019s disclosure by sending back the original service report I had written.<\/p>\n
The customer\u2019s maintenance manager had kept it.<\/p>\n
Signed.<\/p>\n
Dated.<\/p>\n
Unaltered.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe remembered you,\u201d Evelyn said.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe said you were the first person from Hartwell who stopped blaming the software.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked down at my coffee.<\/p>\n
That meant more than I wanted it to.<\/p>\n
Evelyn continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe also said Hartwell\u2019s later summary confused him because it contradicted what you had shown him onsite.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he complain?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe asked his account manager.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat was he told?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat further engineering review had refined the diagnosis.\u201d<\/p>\n
I shook my head.<\/p>\n
The language was always polished.<\/p>\n
Refined.<\/p>\n
Adjusted.<\/p>\n
Recovered.<\/p>\n
Aligned.<\/p>\n
Distributed.<\/p>\n
Every word made the thing underneath it harder to see.<\/p>\n
Evelyn left first.<\/p>\n
I sat for another few minutes before driving home.<\/p>\n
The following morning, Hartwell\u2019s board issued an internal update.<\/p>\n
Grant remained on leave.<\/p>\n
The former HR director had been contacted through counsel.<\/p>\n
Derek continued cooperating.<\/p>\n
Rachel\u2019s review was ongoing.<\/p>\n
The reimbursement process would begin within two weeks.<\/p>\n
Then, just after lunch, Naomi called.<\/p>\n
Her tone was different.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe found the missing HR report.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAngela\u2019s?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe one she said disappeared?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhere?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIn a deleted archive associated with the former HR director.\u201d<\/p>\n
My pulse quickened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does it say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt includes Angela\u2019s nine-month reconciliation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe double recoveries?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd her legal concerns.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnything else?\u201d<\/p>\n
Naomi paused.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere\u2019s an approval note attached.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom Grant?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
I waited.<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom Evelyn.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stopped walking.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt appears to contain her electronic initials acknowledging receipt of the report.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat doesn\u2019t make sense.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe told me she never saw it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe says she didn\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSame issue as the board signature?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPossibly.\u201d<\/p>\n
I thought about Grant\u2019s login applying Evelyn\u2019s electronic signature.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho accessed this one?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s what IT is tracing.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen was it acknowledged?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFour years ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
Before Angela left.<\/p>\n
Before Blue River.<\/p>\n
Before the worst deductions on my record.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf Evelyn really saw that report\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n
Naomi finished the thought.<\/p>\n
\u201cThen the investigation changes.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked through the glass doors at Northline\u2019s shop floor.<\/p>\n
For weeks, Evelyn had been the person uncovering what happened.<\/p>\n
The executive who froze the deductions.<\/p>\n
Called outside counsel.<\/p>\n
Opened the archives.<\/p>\n
Authorized repayments.<\/p>\n
Asked investigators to examine her own decisions.<\/p>\n
Now there was a document suggesting she might have known years earlier.<\/p>\n
\u201cDo you believe she saw it?\u201d<\/p>\n
Naomi\u2019s answer was immediate.<\/p>\n
\u201cBelief is not evidence.\u201d<\/p>\n
I almost smiled.<\/p>\n
I had heard that lesson enough times now.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happens next?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe trace the record.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd until then?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNothing changes.\u201d<\/p>\n
But something had changed.<\/p>\n
At least for me.<\/p>\n
That evening, Evelyn did not call.<\/p>\n
Neither did Rachel.<\/p>\n
Neither did anyone from Hartwell.<\/p>\n
For the first time since my final Friday, the silence felt intentional.<\/p>\n
The next morning, Naomi sent one message.<\/p>\n
IT recovered the access history.<\/p>\n
Call when you can.<\/p>\n
I stepped outside and dialed.<\/p>\n
She answered immediately.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did they find?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe acknowledgment on Angela\u2019s report was entered through Evelyn\u2019s executive account.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach dropped.<\/p>\n
Then Naomi continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cBut Evelyn was not logged in from her workstation.\u201d<\/p>\n
I waited.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe access came through delegated credentials.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhose?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re still confirming.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGrant?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
That surprised me.<\/p>\n
\u201cThen who?\u201d<\/p>\n
Naomi was silent for a moment.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe credentials belonged to Evelyn\u2019s executive assistant at the time.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIs that the same assistant she has now?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho was it?\u201d<\/p>\n
Naomi gave me the name.<\/p>\n
Susan Bell.<\/p>\n
The same former coordinator whose operations administration account had been used to upload Evelyn\u2019s signature to the board packet.<\/p>\n
I stopped moving.<\/p>\n
\u201cSusan worked for Evelyn?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOriginally.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBut Rachel said the board document came from Grant\u2019s executive coordinator.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe did.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo which was she?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBoth.\u201d<\/p>\n
Susan Bell had worked for Evelyn first.<\/p>\n
Then, shortly before Angela raised her concerns, she transferred to Grant\u2019s office.<\/p>\n
For several months during the transition, she retained delegated access to Evelyn\u2019s executive account.<\/p>\n
The acknowledgment on Angela\u2019s report occurred during that overlap.<\/p>\n
The board certification came later from Grant\u2019s account environment.<\/p>\n
I felt the pieces shifting again.<\/p>\n
\u201cCan you prove Susan did it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBut her credentials were used.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIs anyone talking to her?\u201d<\/p>\n
Naomi paused.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe found her last night.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe has agreed to an interview.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThis afternoon.\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked at the time.<\/p>\n
\u201cDoes Evelyn know?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGrant?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHis attorney has been notified that additional records are under review.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does Susan say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe hasn\u2019t given a full statement yet.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnything?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOne thing.\u201d<\/p>\n
I waited.<\/p>\n
Naomi\u2019s voice became quiet.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen we told her what records we were investigating, she asked whether Grant had finally admitted what he made her do.\u201d<\/p>\n
For the second time in three weeks, a single sentence changed the shape of everything we thought we knew.<\/p>\n
And whatever Susan Bell said next was going to decide whether Evelyn had ignored the warning years ago\u2014or whether someone had gone much further than hiding it from her.<\/p>\n
Derek requested another interview the following morning. This time, he brought an attorney. Naomi told me about it afterward, not because I had any right to hear every detail, but … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4670,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4682","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-chapter-story"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4682","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4682"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4682\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4700,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4682\/revisions\/4700"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/4670"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4682"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}