The photocopy lay inside an evidence sleeve.<\/p>\n
Forty-six thousand dollars.<\/p>\n
Crescent Point to L-SAFE.<\/p>\n
The transfer appeared to match the account\u2019s peak balance almost exactly.<\/p>\n
Everything I believed about the reserve changed.<\/p>\n
Grant had described it as money he protected from Derek and Rourke.<\/p>\n
But the largest deposit appeared to originate from a company historically connected to Rourke.<\/p>\n
I sat with Patel, Reeves, Marcus, and Evelyn the next morning.<\/p>\n
\u201cWas Grant lying again?\u201d<\/p>\n
Patel answered carefully.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe don\u2019t know yet.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe said he funded it through earnings and winnings.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSome smaller deposits came from those sources.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cBut the big one came from Crescent Point.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCould Grant not know?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPossible.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow?\u201d<\/p>\n
Reeves opened transaction records.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe transfer passed through an intermediary settlement account before entering L-SAFE.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo Grant may not have seen Crescent Point directly.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCorrect.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat was the intermediary?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAn account controlled by Derek.\u201d<\/p>\n
I closed my eyes.<\/p>\n
Of course.<\/p>\n
\u201cThen Derek put Rourke\u2019s money into Grant\u2019s safety account.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is one possibility.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is what we\u2019re investigating.\u201d<\/p>\n
The handwritten note on the photocopy bothered Patel.<\/p>\n
It was not Miles.<\/p>\n
His anonymous messaging had ended, and device evidence supported that.<\/p>\n
Someone else had delivered this.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho knew about the transfer?\u201d<\/p>\n
I asked.<\/p>\n
\u201cDerek certainly could.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRourke?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLikely, if Crescent Point remained under his control.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGrant?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cUnknown.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCynthia?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cShe says she did not.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDad?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo evidence.\u201d<\/p>\n
The pool narrowed.<\/p>\n
I asked, \u201cCould Derek have sent the envelope?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy would he?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTo redirect attention toward Rourke.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCould Rourke?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTo redirect attention toward Grant or Derek.\u201d<\/p>\n
Everyone could use truth strategically.<\/p>\n
That was the problem.<\/p>\n
Evidence did not become false because someone had a motive to reveal it.<\/p>\n
But motive mattered.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does Grant say?\u201d<\/p>\n
Marcus looked at his notes.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe claims he did not know the transfer ultimately came from Crescent Point.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo records support that?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHis banking interface may have shown the intermediary.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo maybe.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he think the forty-six thousand was?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSettlement funds.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFrom what?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAn MD Ventures distribution owed to him.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWas he actually owed that much?\u201d<\/p>\n
Reeves answered.<\/p>\n
\u201cPotentially, depending on how internal balances were calculated.\u201d<\/p>\n
Nothing in this network had a clean price.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy call it L-SAFE?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGrant says because he intended it for you.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy not Laurel?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe feared Derek searching account references.\u201d<\/p>\n
That made sense.<\/p>\n
Too much sense.<\/p>\n
I disliked it.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does Derek say?\u201d<\/p>\n
Patel\u2019s expression changed.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe says the transfer was not Grant\u2019s money.\u201d<\/p>\n
I leaned forward.<\/p>\n
\u201cThen whose?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRourke\u2019s.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFor what?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCollateral reserve.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cCollateral for what?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGrant.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stared.<\/p>\n
\u201cGrant himself?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot physically. Financial performance.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cExplain.\u201d<\/p>\n
Reeves took over.<\/p>\n
\u201cAccording to Derek, Rourke advanced funds to stabilize obligations associated with Grant\u2019s accounts. The money was placed where Grant controlled it, but Rourke viewed it as reserve capital.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo Grant thought he had forty-six thousand protected from Rourke that was actually Rourke\u2019s money.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat may be what happened.\u201d<\/p>\n
The irony would have been funny if it were not my life.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Rourke expect repayment?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWas that included in the one hundred thirty-two thousand?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPartially.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach dropped.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow much of Grant\u2019s debt to Rourke was actually this reserve?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPotentially most of the original principal.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stared.<\/p>\n
The debt story changed again.<\/p>\n
Grant borrowed from Rourke.<\/p>\n
Rourke funded reserve.<\/p>\n
Grant treated reserve as escape money.<\/p>\n
Then owed Rourke for it.<\/p>\n
A snake swallowing itself.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy would Rourke put money where Grant could hide it?\u201d<\/p>\n
Reeves looked at Patel.<\/p>\n
She answered.<\/p>\n
\u201cDerek says Rourke wanted Grant liquid enough to keep operating.\u201d<\/p>\n
There it was.<\/p>\n
Not rescue.<\/p>\n
Maintenance.<\/p>\n
Grant\u2019s survival had value.<\/p>\n
As long as I trusted him, he remained useful.<\/p>\n
As long as he remained useful, they kept him functional.<\/p>\n
L-SAFE might never have been protection.<\/p>\n
It might have been operating capital Grant emotionally reclassified as protection because that made him feel better.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did Grant spend from it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTax payment. Furnace.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cLegitimate things.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Rourke object?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo evidence.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cKeeping your household stable may have served the broader operation.\u201d<\/p>\n
I sat back.<\/p>\n
That hurt.<\/p>\n
Even the good acts could serve the machine.<\/p>\n
Pay my taxes.<\/p>\n
Fix the furnace.<\/p>\n
Keep Laurel calm.<\/p>\n
Keep the house functioning.<\/p>\n
Maintain trust.<\/p>\n
Operational stability.<\/p>\n
I hated that Grant\u2019s private refuge might never have been private at all.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does Grant say now?\u201d<\/p>\n
Evelyn handed me a statement.<\/p>\n
He wrote:<\/p>\n
I believed the forty-six was mine. Derek told me it was my share of cleared settlement money.<\/p>\n
That could be true.<\/p>\n
Then:<\/p>\n
When I moved it to L-SAFE, I thought I was finally keeping something from them.<\/p>\n
I read on.<\/p>\n
If Rourke funded it, then I was more trapped than I understood.<\/p>\n
I stopped.<\/p>\n
There.<\/p>\n
A dangerous sentence.<\/p>\n
More trapped than I understood.<\/p>\n
True perhaps.<\/p>\n
Also useful.<\/p>\n
Grant could convert discovery into victimhood if he was not careful.<\/p>\n
I continued.<\/p>\n
That does not change what I did to Laurel.<\/p>\n
Better.<\/p>\n
I knew Derek manipulated balances. I knew money moved in ways I did not understand. I chose to take the funds anyway.<\/p>\n
There it was.<\/p>\n
Responsibility preserved.<\/p>\n
I appreciated that more than I wanted to.<\/p>\n
His statement continued.<\/p>\n
I used some of that money to pay Laurel\u2019s tax bill and furnace because I wanted to do something normal with it.<\/p>\n
Normal.<\/p>\n
The word hurt.<\/p>\n
Grant had lived among abnormal money so long that paying a tax bill felt cleansing.<\/p>\n
He wrote:<\/p>\n
I thought if money paid for something legitimate, that part of me was still legitimate.<\/p>\n
I closed the page.<\/p>\n
Mara asked later, \u201cDo you believe him?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAbout that feeling? Yes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDoes it matter?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt explains him.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot excuses.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
That boundary was becoming instinctive.<\/p>\n
Understanding no longer threatened accountability.<\/p>\n
The next question was who delivered the photocopy.<\/p>\n
Security footage showed someone approaching the house at night wearing a cap and hood.<\/p>\n
No clear face.<\/p>\n
Vehicle parked outside camera range.<\/p>\n
Not helpful.<\/p>\n
But handwriting analysis suggested the note likely came from someone whose writing existed in seized records.<\/p>\n
Patel would not say who until confirmed.<\/p>\n
Two days later, she called.<\/p>\n
\u201cProbable match.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWho?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDerek.\u201d<\/p>\n
I was not surprised.<\/p>\n
\u201cDid he admit it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThrough counsel, yes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe says he wanted you to know Rourke had misrepresented the debt.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTo help me?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe says to correct the record.\u201d<\/p>\n
I laughed.<\/p>\n
\u201cTry again.\u201d<\/p>\n
Patel paused.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe also has obvious incentive to shift responsibility toward Rourke.\u201d<\/p>\n
There it was.<\/p>\n
Truth as weapon.<\/p>\n
\u201cWas the document real?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo even though Derek\u2019s motive is self-serving, the evidence matters.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCorrect.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does Rourke say?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe disputes Derek\u2019s interpretation.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOf course.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow does he characterize it?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWorking-capital advance.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTo who?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMD Ventures-related activity.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot Grant personally.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cCorrect.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen why was Grant paying interest?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is disputed.\u201d<\/p>\n
I rubbed my forehead.<\/p>\n
The criminal and civil cases had become less about discovering whether wrongdoing happened and more about tracing ownership of each wrongdoing.<\/p>\n
Rourke: financier.<\/p>\n
Derek: operator.<\/p>\n
Grant: accounts and access.<\/p>\n
Cynthia: accounting.<\/p>\n
Dad: early facilitator.<\/p>\n
Miles: late concealer and evidence collector.<\/p>\n
No one wanted the center.<\/p>\n
Everyone wanted an edge.<\/p>\n
But the system had no edge.<\/p>\n
It functioned because all of them contributed.<\/p>\n
That week, the divorce negotiations moved faster.<\/p>\n
Grant agreed not to classify Mill Street-related liabilities as marital except where law required litigation.<\/p>\n
He accepted factual acknowledgments regarding my business.<\/p>\n
He agreed proceeds from L-SAFE, if legally cleared, could be allocated toward debts wrongfully created in my name before any remainder was divided.<\/p>\n
That seemed fair.<\/p>\n
Almost responsible.<\/p>\n
I reminded myself responsible now did not erase irresponsible then.<\/p>\n
The house remained.<\/p>\n
Evelyn asked what I wanted.<\/p>\n
\u201cSell.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou\u2019re sure?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou could keep it depending on final numbers.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t want it.\u201d<\/p>\n
That answer surprised me by how easily it came.<\/p>\n
For weeks I had thought selling would feel like losing.<\/p>\n
Now I understood the house had become a ledger too.<\/p>\n
Not because walls held memories.<\/p>\n
Because every room had been drafted into Grant\u2019s system.<\/p>\n
Office for documents.<\/p>\n
Garage for notebooks.<\/p>\n
Kitchen for control.<\/p>\n
Deed for collateral.<\/p>\n
Equity for escape.<\/p>\n
I wanted a place no one else had already assigned a function.<\/p>\n
Mara looked sad when I told her.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou loved that kitchen.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI loved what I did in it.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat can move.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
That mattered.<\/p>\n
Laurel Bakes was not the room.<\/p>\n
It was me.<\/p>\n
The next morning, I accepted the corporate event order.<\/p>\n
One hundred twenty guests.<\/p>\n
Largest order since leaving Grant.<\/p>\n
I rented temporary commercial kitchen space for production.<\/p>\n
Legitimate contract.<\/p>\n
Independent account.<\/p>\n
My own processor.<\/p>\n
No shared credentials.<\/p>\n
Every boring administrative detail felt luxurious.<\/p>\n
I sent the deposit invoice.<\/p>\n
Then I checked the bank.<\/p>\n
Payment arrived.<\/p>\n
Clean.<\/p>\n
I almost laughed.<\/p>\n
Just money earned for work performed.<\/p>\n
Nothing hidden behind it.<\/p>\n
No internal ledger.<\/p>\n
No partner.<\/p>\n
No collateral.<\/p>\n
Ordinary commerce.<\/p>\n
Beautiful.<\/p>\n
That evening, Grant sent a final letter regarding the house.<\/p>\n
Laurel,<\/p>\n
I know selling it is probably the right thing.<\/p>\n
I read on.<\/p>\n
There is one wall in the pantry where your height marks are from when you tried to measure the new shelving and wrote directly on the paint because you couldn\u2019t find a pencil.<\/p>\n
I remembered.<\/p>\n
Grant had laughed at me.<\/p>\n
The mark was still there.<\/p>\n
He wrote:<\/p>\n
If you want, I\u2019ll pay to have that section photographed professionally before the sale.<\/p>\n
I stared.<\/p>\n
Such a small offer.<\/p>\n
Not financial.<\/p>\n
Not strategic.<\/p>\n
Just memory.<\/p>\n
I cried.<\/p>\n
For the first time in several parts of my life, grief arrived without anger standing in front of it.<\/p>\n
Mara found me.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat happened?\u201d<\/p>\n
I showed her.<\/p>\n
She read.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s\u2026 actually thoughtful.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYou want the picture?\u201d<\/p>\n
I looked away.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen take the picture.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt feels stupid.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
She sat beside me.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou don\u2019t have to hate every memory to leave.\u201d<\/p>\n
I closed my eyes.<\/p>\n
That sentence freed something.<\/p>\n
The marriage had contained fraud.<\/p>\n
It had also contained mornings.<\/p>\n
Jokes.<\/p>\n
Paint marks.<\/p>\n
Coffee.<\/p>\n
Birthday cakes before the last one.<\/p>\n
Arguments that were ordinary, not strategic.<\/p>\n
Moments where Grant was just my husband.<\/p>\n
I did not need to burn those memories to prove the marriage had become unsafe.<\/p>\n
I could leave with complexity.<\/p>\n
The next day, I told Evelyn yes.<\/p>\n
Photograph the pantry wall.<\/p>\n
Nothing more.<\/p>\n
Then Patel called.<\/p>\n
\u201cRourke\u2019s counsel has made a proffer.\u201d<\/p>\n
My pulse changed.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does that mean?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe is offering information under negotiated conditions.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAgainst Derek?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPrimarily.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo now Rourke wants to cooperate too.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Everyone turning.<\/p>\n
Everyone trying to move from center to edge.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does he say about me?\u201d<\/p>\n
Patel paused.<\/p>\n
\u201cHe claims he never intended to own Laurel Bakes permanently.\u201d<\/p>\n
I laughed.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did he intend?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cTo use a secured interest as leverage until Grant\u2019s debts and network obligations were resolved.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s control.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about keeping me there?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe says continuity preserved business value.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cExactly.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHis wording is more financial.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cOf course.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does he say about the forged signature?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat he rejected it once he suspected it was not yours.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThat matches evidence.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about the Thursday meeting?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe confirms he wanted your real signature after partial disclosure.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEnough to bind me.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe describes it as lawful informed consent.\u201d<\/p>\n
I almost laughed again.<\/p>\n
\u201cWould he have told me my father\u2019s identity fraud started all this?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cGrant\u2019s forgeries?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNot all.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cMara?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHis old role with Kane?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cNo.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThen informed is doing heroic work.\u201d<\/p>\n
Patel said nothing.<\/p>\n
She did not need to.<\/p>\n
Then she added, \u201cThere is one thing in his statement that changes the debt timeline.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe says Grant did not originally owe him one hundred thirty-two thousand.\u201d<\/p>\n
My stomach tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow much?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cForty-six.\u201d<\/p>\n
The reserve.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSo how did it become one thirty-two?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDerek.\u201d<\/p>\n
I went still.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did Derek do?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAccording to Rourke, Derek added obligations, interest, processor losses, and betting balances to Grant\u2019s internal debt without Rourke authorizing all of them.\u201d<\/p>\n
My mind raced.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo Grant thought he owed Rourke money that may actually have been partly Derek\u2019s claim.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDid Rourke know?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHe says not until later.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDo records support him?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cSome do.\u201d<\/p>\n
For once, Rourke\u2019s story might actually reduce his role in one specific wrong.<\/p>\n
Not innocence.<\/p>\n
Precision.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow much did Grant truly owe Rourke?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cStill under review.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow much to Derek?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cPossibly much more than Grant realized.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stared at the wall.<\/p>\n
Grant had spent years trying to repay a number whose ownership he did not even understand.<\/p>\n
Recovery fixation built on false accounting.<\/p>\n
A perfect trap for him.<\/p>\n
Then Patel said, \u201cThere is one final detail.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cDerek kept two ledgers.\u201d<\/p>\n
I stopped.<\/p>\n
\u201cOne for Grant?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd one real?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cHow different?\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cVery.\u201d<\/p>\n
My chest tightened.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat did the real ledger say Grant owed?\u201d<\/p>\n
Patel paused.<\/p>\n
\u201cAlmost nothing by the time of the birthday dinner.\u201d<\/p>\n
The photocopy lay inside an evidence sleeve. Forty-six thousand dollars. Crescent Point to L-SAFE. The transfer appeared to match the account\u2019s peak balance almost exactly. Everything I believed about the … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7455,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7490","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-chapter-story"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7490","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7490"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7490\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7529,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7490\/revisions\/7529"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/7455"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7490"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7490"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thechapterstory.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7490"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}